Friday, December 15, 2006

Parshat Vayeshev

Shabbat Chanukah I
(Zechariah 2:14-4:7)
December 16, 2006

Parshat Vayeshev – 1st Shabbat Hanukah (Zechariah 2:14-4:7)
Zechariah's vision of the golden candelabra (menorah) is what most certainly caused the sages to associate his prophetic message with the festival of Hanukah: "The angel who talked with me came back and woke me as a man who is wakened from sleep. He said to me, 'What do you see?' And I answered: 'I see a lampstand (menorah) all of gold, with a bowl (v'gula) above it.' (4:1-2) Zechariah's answer to the angel at this point is simply to give a physical description of what he has seen. His description does not include an interpretation of the significance of this vision. Later in this chapter, this vision will be interpreted as a symbol of Zechariah's contemporary political reality (see verse 14) but for the moment the visual nature of the prophecy is left untouched.

Later sages, however, interpreted this vision to represent the future state of the Jewish people. If the condition of the Jewish people was currently abject and tainted by sin then their future was to be reflected in the purity of the golden menorah: "'O mortal, the House of Israel has become dross to Me (God).' (Ezekiel 22:18) Said Zechariah: 'I foresee that in the future they will be totally pure gold (without dross): 'I see a lampstand all of gold, with a bowl (v'gula) above it etc. and two olive trees above it.' [The midrash now comes to interpret the word "gula".] Two Amoraim [sages from the period of the Talmud] disagreed regarding its meaning. One sage said it referred to 'exile – golah' while the other sage said it referred to 'its redeemer – goalah'. The sage who said it referred to 'exile' meant that when they were exiled to Babylonia, God's immanent presence (the Shechina) was exiled along with them. The sage who thought that Zechariah was referring to "its redeemer" meant by this that God is Israel's Redeemer, as it is written: 'Our Redeemer, Lord of Hosts is His name." (Isaiah 47:4)" (Shir Hashirim Rabbah 4:7)

These two different interpretations might be combined for a Hanukah message. There are times when we truly have a sense of being in exile. There is no place more lonely, desperate or hopeless than being in exile. The message of this midrash is that we are not alone in exile. God is with us, sharing with us and empathizing with us. Moreover, God will ultimately redeem us and restore us. This message brought us redemption in the story of Hanukah. It will restore us and rescue us from our adversity today so that we will ultimately triumph.

This study piece is offered as a service of the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva. It is prepared by Rabbi Mordechai (Mitchell) Silverstein, senior lecturer in Talmud and Midrash at the Conservative Yeshiva. He is a graduate of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America. With the permission of The United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem, Rabbi Edward S. Romm - Director of Education© 2005

---Dear Congregants: As you know these commentaries are sent to us by the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem. If you would like to support the continuation of these commentaries, I suggest that you make a donation to Haftorah Commentary at the Conservative Yeshiva and send it to:

The Conservative Yeshiva
c⁄o USCJRapaport House
155 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10010-6802

Please designate your donation for the Haftorah Commentary and note that you attend Beth Shalom Synagogue, Columbia, SC.

Henry Ray Wengrow
Ritual Chair
Beth Shalom

Celebrate Hanukkah at Riverbanks’ Lights Before Christmas

Celebrate the season at Riverbanks Zoo and Garden’s Lights Before Christmas, the Midlands’ largest and longest running holiday tradition. This year Riverbanks has added a special section for those families celebrating Hanukkah. The Star of David and menorah will illuminate the sky in a festive tribute to Hanukkah, starting Friday, December 15.

Lights Before Christmas will run November 24 through December 30 from 6-9 pm. Lights will be closed Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. Riverbanks Society members receive one free visit to Lights, and general admission is $5 for children and $7 for adults. Lights tickets can be purchased in advance at www.riverbanks.org or at the gate.

Happenings: Sunday, Dec. 17

ADULT EDUCATION SEMINAR: Sunday, December 17, 10 a.m. “The Dead Sea Scrolls - Updated”, Moderated by: Rabbi Philip Silverstein (bagel & lox breakfast $3 per person)

ANNUAL CONGREGATIONAL MEETING: Beth Shalom Board of Directors Election for the 2007 Board Sunday, December 17, 2006, 12 noon (you must be a member in good standing to vote) Please make plans to attend!

Thursday, November 30, 2006

Parshat Vayetze

Dear Congregants:

Due to Thanksgiving and a visit to my mother in Asheville, I was not able to send out last week's commentary for Parshat Toldot. I am including it in this week's e mail so consider this a two for the price of one sale.

As you know these commentaries are sent to us by the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem. If you would like to support the continuation of these commentaries, I suggest that you make a donation to Haftorah Commentary at the Conservative Yeshiva and send it to:

The Conservative Yeshiva
c⁄o USCJ
Rapaport House
155 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10010-6802
Please designate your donation for the Haftorah Commentary and note that you attend Beth Shalom Synagogue, Columbia, SC.


Parshat Vayetze
(Hosea 12:13-14:10)
December 2, 2006

An interpreter's task is to attempt to explain both the meaning and the context of what might otherwise be incomprehensible. This week's Haftorah offers just such an opportunity. Hosea's second prophecy in the Haftorah opens with a challenge to the behavior of the northern kingdom: "(1) When Ephraim spoke piety, he was exalted in Israel; but he incurred sin through Baal and so he died. (2) And now they go on sinning; they have made them molten images, idols by their skill (ktivunam atzabim), from their silver, wholly the work of craftsmen, yet for these they appoint men to sacrifice; they are wont to kiss calves!" (Hosea 13:1-2) Hosea's original audience probably understood the specific references mentioned in this message. For later readers, however, the identity of both the heroes and villains is unclear. Even the sin being criticized is obscure.

Rashi identifies "Ephraim" with Jeroboam, the first king of the northern kingdom, Israel. He asserts that Jeroboam initially feared God when he came out against Solomon. He became a powerful leader and was recognized as king of the northern kingdom. After he rose to greatness, he turned to idolatry causing his own downfall and the downfall of his house. Rashi notes that this same description also fits Ahab, another powerful northern king, feared by all, who turned to idolatry and as a result, he and his line perished. Rabbi David Kimche (12th century Provance), following the translation of Targum Jonathan (7th century Eretz Yisrael), accepts Rashi's line of reasoning without identifying "Ephraim" with a particular king, stating only that all of the kingdoms surrounding Israel feared him, until his idolatrous sin caused his downfall against these very nations.

The following passage from the Talmud sought to focus on the nature of the sin rather than the identity of the perpetrator. It removed the significance of Hosea's prophecy from its historical context and sought out its meaning for its own contemporary circumstances. In doing so, we learn something of the rabbinic attitude toward idolatry: "Said Rabbi Yitzhak: What is meant when it is written: 'And now they go on sinning; they have made molten images of their silver, idols by their skill. What is the meaning of 'idols by their skill (ktivunam atzabim)? It means that every person made an image of a deity according to his or her own understanding (ktivunam) and each person kept his deity in his pocket. Whenever he remembered it, he would take it out and embrace it and kiss it." (Sanhedrin 63b)

The next interpretation shows how some used their idolatrous practices to self serving ends: "'What is the meaning of 'those who slaughter people shall kiss calves?' (Notice how they translate the phrase differently from what is found above.) Rabbi Yitzchak of the house of Rabbi Ami said: 'The priests of the idols would cast their eyes on wealthy people [in order to acquire their property]. They would starve their idolatrous calves and place before the feeding troughs of the calves images of the wealthy people [so that the calves would associate their faces with food.] When the calves would see the wealthy people, they would run toward them with great passion. The priests of the idols would say: 'See how the idolatrous calf yearns for you – perhaps you should offer yourself as a sacrifice' (so that they might confiscate their property). Rava disagrees with this interpretation: The verse reads: 'Those who slaughter people kiss calves', [for the above interpretation to make sense], it should say: 'the calves kiss to slaughter a person'. Rather, Rava suggests that the verse should be interpreted this way: 'Whenever someone offered his child as a sacrifice to an idol, he would be told: 'You have offered a great gift to the idol. Now come and kiss the idol.'" (Ibid.)

The sages display in these various portraits of idolatrous behavior various obscene excesses and perversions in the name of religion. The first displays a religious faith which is simply a self portrait where a person worships what is closest to his heart, an excess in self interest. The second pictures those who use religion for their own self aggrandizement to the detriment of others. Rava offers a vision where a person practices an obscene religious excess and is then asked to justify it. If there is a thread which winds it way through these various portraits of idolatrous behavior, it is people's inability to distinguish between their own self concerns and serving God. Crossing this fine line can have terrible consequences.


Parshat Toldot
(Malachi 1:1-2:7)
November 25, 2006

The book of Malachi has a unique style among Biblical books. Its thoughts are shaped in the form of small rhetorical dialectic arguments. In one of these arguments, the prophet chastises the people of Israel for its disloyalty to God, chiding them with a comparison to their neighbors: "For from where the sun rises to where it sets, My name is honored among the nations, and everywhere incense and pure oblation are offered to My name, for My name is honored among the nations – said the Lord of Hosts. But you profane it when you say, 'The table of the Lord is defiled and the meat, the food, can be treated with scorn…" (Malachi 1:11-12)

Rashi records an opinion that "there were sages who held that this verse meant that even though the nations of the world worshipped other gods, still they recognized that God is God over all of the other gods, willingly making offerings in His name." Malachi intended to force the people of Israel to recognize the bitter irony that sometimes the nations of the world have something to teach the people of Israel about religious behavior especially when the nations treat the religion of Israel with honor while Jews sometimes treat God and their own religious tradition with contempt.

This recognition prompted the following 7th century midrash to ask why God continues His special relationship with the people of Israel: Said the Holy One Blessed Be He to Israel: "Not because you are a larger people than other peoples, and not because you do more mitzvoth (here: good deeds) than other people, for [there are times when] they glorify My name more than you, as it says: 'For from where the sun rises to where it sets, My name is honored among the nations… But you profane it when you say; The table of the Lord is defiled.' (1:11-12) Furthermore, you are the smallest (hame'at) of nations. Still, 'the Lord favored you' (Deut. 7:8) [What explains this anomaly?] I [God] love you because you [the people of Israel] belittle (hemeat) yourselves in My presence. This is why I love you, as it says: 'I have shown you love, said the Lord. (Malachi 1:2) (Tanhuma Buber ed. Ekev 4)

According to this midrash, Israel possesses the special ability to be self-critical before God. This midrash asserts that Jews are no better than the other nations of the world. Sometimes, the nations will even outdo us in their religious commitments to God. What distinguishes us is our ability to "belittle" ourselves, recognize mistakes and hopefully correct them. This is the message of the prophets to their people. Without this ability a nation and people will remain static, mired in whatever wrongs they might accumulate, never able to renew their relationships with God. The ability to humble oneself and recognize ones relationship with God and to fix that which is broken is why God loves the Jewish people. This ability is a gift we must share with the world.

This study piece is offered as a service of the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva. It is prepared by Rabbi Mordechai (Mitchell) Silverstein, senior lecturer in Talmud and Midrash at the Conservative Yeshiva. He is a graduate of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America.

With the permission of The United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem, Rabbi Edward S. Romm - Director of Education
© 2005


Henry Ray Wengrow
Ritual Chair
Beth Shalom

Friday, November 17, 2006

Parshat Haye Sarah

Dear Friends:
By my count this is the 33rd Haftorah commentary that I have sent out. As you all know, this commentary is provided by the Conservative seminary in Israel. What you may not know is that it is supported by contributions and next week or the week after I will provide you with an opportunity to show your appreciation by telling you how you can contribute.

Parshat Haye Sarah
(1 Kings 1:1-31)
November 18, 2006


The conflict between Adonijah and Solomon over the right to succeed their father had a profound impact not only on the relationships in David's family but on the kingdom as well. It threatened the integrity of David's fragile monarchy which had only been in existence a single generation. How was David to fend off this challenge to his rule and how was he to protect his own ability to name his successor?

David thwarted Adoniyah's palace coup by having his son Solomon anointed as king: "Let the priest Zadok and the prophet Nathan anoint him there king over Israel, where upon you shall sound the horn and shout, 'Long live King Solomon!' (verse 34) Sages in rabbinic times (2nd century Eretz Yisrael) noticed, however, what they thought to be a halachic anomaly in how David met the threat to his kingdom. David's move contradicted what for the sages was established law and consequently established a new precedent: "[the anointing oil made by Moses] was used to anoint the high priest who was the son of the high priest but a king who was the son of the king need not be anointed. So why then was Solomon anointed? [He was anointed in order] to resolve the dispute with Adonijah. (Sifra Tzav, Mechilta d'Milluim Parsha 1, 9)

David's stop gap measure become established law and was ultimately codified by Maimonides: One does not anoint the king who is the son of a king, except where there is a dispute or a war over the crown. In these instances, one anoints the future king in order to quash the dispute. This is why they anointed Solomon – because of Adoniyah (Mishneh Torah Laws of Kings 1:12)

This ruling played an interesting role in a ruling (teshuva) of the First Sephardic Chief Rabbi of the State of Israel, Rabbi Ben Zion Uziel, who was asked whether the position of rabbi of a synagogue was an inherited position or not. He asserted that a synagogue did not necessarily have to hire the son of its previous rabbi, noting that since Adoniyah had popular support, he would have become the accepted king if David had not had Solomon anointed. Where there is no possibility of anointing a leader, according to Rabbi Uziel, then popular acclamation was the means for determining a leader. Consequently, synagogues should not be bound to accept as rabbi a person who had inherited the position.

Furthermore, Rabbi Uziel asserts, using this argument that it is not acceptable for a kingdom to have a leader thrust upon the people of a kingdom where there is no popular affirmation. His reading of this story and its legal ramifications leads him to conclude that there are two conditions for leadership: 1. the leader must be qualified for the position; 2. the leader must have popular affirmation. (See Mishpatei Uziel 2:42:1)

Ultimately, Rabbi Uziel reads this law in a way which affirms the people's right to choose and the need for a normative means of choosing a leader. The governing stability that David sought to achieve in an authoritative way, Uziel seeks to establish by democratic means.

This study piece is offered as a service of the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva. It is prepared by Rabbi Mordechai (Mitchell) Silverstein, senior lecturer in Talmud and Midrash at the Conservative Yeshiva. He is a graduate of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America.

With the permission of The United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem, Rabbi Edward S. Romm - Director of Education
© 2005


Henry Ray Wengrow
Ritual Chair
Beth Shalom
896-7780 or 361-1867

Thursday, November 09, 2006

Parshat Vayera

Parshat Vayera
(2 Kings 4:1-37)
November 11, 2006

This week's haftarah contains two miraculous episodes in which Elisha, Elijah's protégé, saved hapless victims from tragic circumstances. In the first story, Elisha saved a poverty stricken woman from having to sell her children into slavery to settle her debts. This woman, who remains anonymous in the biblical story, becomes a heroic figure in a midrash that will be the focus of our studies.

This midrash focuses on the first verse of the haftarah: "A certain woman, the wife of one of the disciples of the prophets, cried out to Elisha: 'Your servant my husband is dead, and you know how your servant revered the Lord.'" (verse 1) However, this midrash takes this verse totally out of its original context and instead reads it as part of the unrelated story which precedes it in the book of Kings. This midrash is based on a method of interpretation known as "simihat parshiyot – the juxtaposition of passages" which allows the interpreter to interpret two unrelated passages in close physical proximity to each other in the biblical text as if they were indeed related, with surprising results.

The previous passage (3:24-27) relates the story of the Moabite king, Mesha, whose unsuccessful battles against the army of Judah, led him to sacrifice his only son to his deity in the hope that it would bring him success in battle. After recording this event, the Bible comments: "A great wrath came upon Israel, so they withdrew from him and went back to their own land." (verse 27) The combination of this verse and the preceding events troubled the sages and required explanation. The following midrash used the opening verse of our haftarah to resolve this problem: Rabbi Nehuniah ben Hakaneh says: 'Righteousness raises a people to honor" refers to Israel, [the second half of the verse:] "lovingkindness is a disgrace to any nation" is interpreted to mean that the acts of lovingkindness done by the other nations of the world disgrace Israel.' (See Proverbs 14:34) From whom do we learn the truth of this interpretation? We learn it from Mesha, king of Moab. What did he do? He gathered all of his astrologers and asked them: When I make war on any other nation, I defeat them. Why is it that when I make war on the Jews, they defeat me? They answered him: [They defeat you because] of the merits of one of their ancestors. Mesha asked: 'Who is this ancestor?' They said: 'His name was Abraham.' Mesha asked once again: 'What did he do?' They responded: 'An only son was given to him when he was a hundred years old and nevertheless he offered him up as a sacrifice.' He asked: 'Did he really sacrifice him?' They answered: 'No.' Mesha said: 'Well if he didn't sacrifice him and still miracles were done for him, if he really would have sacrificed him, how much more so! Now, I have an only son who in the future will become king in my stead. If I offer him as a sacrifice to my deity, perhaps miracles will be performed for me. He offered him up. Afterwards, Scripture says: 'A great wrath came upon Israel.' Why should Israel be punished if a foreign king offers his son as a sacrifice to a foreign deity? The Holy One Blessed be He said to Israel: 'My children, the nations of the world don't recognize My strength and so rebel against Me, but you who recognize My strength, still rebel against Me. [This explains how the nations embarrass Israel.] Said Rabbi Mana: 'Were it not for the merit of the wife of Ovadiah (the woman in our story), Israel would have been destroyed at that very moment. What did she do? She pronounced her recognition of God: 'A certain woman, the wife of one of the disciples of the prophets, cried out to Elisha: 'Your servant my husband is dead, and you know how your servant revered the Lord.' (adapted and abridged from Pesikta d'Rav Kahana 2:5 Mandelbaum ed. pp. 21-3)

Rabbi Mana uses this "smichat parshiyot" to illustrate that every one of us, even the person in the most humble of circumstances, has the potential to rescue not only Israel through their actions and beliefs but possibly even the world.

This study piece is offered as a service of the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva. It is prepared by Rabbi Mordechai (Mitchell) Silverstein, senior lecturer in Talmud and Midrash at the Conservative Yeshiva. He is a graduate of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America.

With the permission of The United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem, Rabbi Edward S. Romm - Director of Education
© 2005


Henry Ray Wengrow
Ritual Chair
Beth Shalom

Friday, November 03, 2006

Friday Night Talks

On Friday evenings, starting in November, Rabbi Siff will begin teaching on a rotating schedule of 4 topics. Each of these 4 topics will form a year-long series.

1st Friday of each month: Taking it Home: Jewish Observance Outside the Synagogue–Rabbi Siff will explore the details and purpose of halachic practices. He will start with a discussion of the Sabbath, looking both at the details of observance and at how the Sabbath can transform our lives.

2nd Friday of each month: Jewish Prayer as a Spiritual Practice–Rabbi Siff will discuss the meaning of Jewish Prayer in general, and how the prayers help us relate to God and each other, and to grow as human beings.

3rd Friday of each month: Luzzatto’s “Path of the Upright”–this inspirational book, stemming from the ethical⁄mystical tradition, discusses 12 middot (virtues), which form steps on the path to a life infused with holiness. Each week, Rabbi Siff will discuss one middah.

4th Friday of each month: Judaism in our Everyday Life–Rabbi Siff will explore Judaism’s teachings about how we treat each other in our business, family and social lives.

Hope to see you there!
Rabbi David Siff

Parshat Lekh Lekha

Parshat Lekh Lekha
(Isaiah 40:27-41:16)
November 4, 2006

Isaiah challenged his fellow countrymen for abandoning God and for acting as if God is unaware of their actions. He reminded them that God is not only aware of their actions but is the one who lends "strength to the weary" and "fresh vigor to the spent". (40:29). He is also the One who rewards those who believe in Him: "But they who trust in the Lord shall renew their strength as eagles grow new plumes (yaalu eiver kanesharim): They shall run and not grow weary; they shall march and not grow faint." (40:31)

Targum Yonathan, the 7th century Aramaic translation of the Prophets, asserts that this last description describes God's promise to rescue those loyal to Him from Babylonian exile: "Those who believe in God's power to redeem, He will gather them from throughout the exile, increase their strength, renew their youth like the new growth on the wings of eagles; they will run and not be weary, they will march and not grow faint."

The Targum draws our attention, in particular to Isaiah's remarkable comparison between the renewal of strength and the development of new plumage on the wings of an eagle. Apparently there was a popular belief in Biblical times that eagles regain their youth when they molt. (NJPS p. 937) This same idea is also expressed by the psalmist: "He (God) satisfies you with good things in the prime of life so that your youth is renewed like an eagle." (103:5)

Rabbi David Kimche (12th century Provence) develops this idea in an unusual way. He quotes an otherwise lost explanation of this image from Rabbi Saadiah Gaon, the most prominent sage from the period of the Gaonim (9th century Egypt, Eretz Yisrael, Babylonia): "For the eagle (phoenix?) rises up high in the heavens for ten years, approaching the heat of the sun, and then thrusts itself into the ocean because of the great heat, molts its feathers, is renewed afterwards, sprouts wings and is restored to the days of its youth. This happens every ten years until the age of one hundred years. When it reaches one hundred, it rises up and falls into the ocean and dies."

This interpretation bears an incredible resemblance to the mythological phoenix, a bird known in the ancient world for its ability to regenerate and reincarnate itself. Saadya apparently seized upon this popular legend and associated it with Isaiah's "nesher" to produce a symbol of constant renewal. This symbol represented, for Saadya, the fate of the Jewish people in the world. They will perpetually rise up out of the ashes, invigorated with renewed strength to build a future even greater than the past. May Saadya's vision become our reality.

This study piece is offered as a service of the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva. It is prepared by Rabbi Mordechai (Mitchell) Silverstein, senior lecturer in Talmud and Midrash at the Conservative Yeshiva. He is a graduate of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America.

With the permission of The United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem, Rabbi Edward S. Romm - Director of Education
© 2005

Henry Ray Wengrow
Ritual Chair, Beth Shalom

Minyan cancellation

The minyan previously scheduled for this Sunday, November 5th is cancelled.

The Ritual Committee is working on the Sunday minyan schedule and hope to have the new time & schedule announced soon.

Thank you!
Beth Shalom Synagogue

Wednesday, October 11, 2006

Hoshanah Rabbah service will be Friday morning at 7:30 AM

Dear Congregants:

Reminder that Hoshanah Rabbah service will be Friday morning at 7:30 AM.

Yes, that is in the morning. If you have never been to a weekday service during Sukkoth then you are in for a treat when we march around with the lulav and etrog as was done in the Temple 2000 years ago. You owe it to yourself to be there. Here is an excerpt from Judaism 101 on the web:

"The four species are also held and waved during the Hallel prayer in religious services, and are held during processions around the bema (the pedestal where the Torah is read) called hakafot each day during the holiday. These processions commemorate similar processions around the altar of the ancient Temple in Jerusalem. This part of the service is known as Hoshanot, because while the procession is made, we recite a prayer with the refrain, "Hosha na!" (please save us!). On the seventh day of Sukkoth, seven circuits are made. For this reason, the seventh day of Sukkoth is known as Hoshanah Rabbah (the great Hoshanah). After the circuits on Hoshanah Rabbah, we beat the willow branches against the floor five times, shaking loose some or all of the remaining leaves."

Henry Ray Wengrow
Ritual Chair
Beth Shalom

Shemini Atzeret

Shemini Atzeret
(1 Kings 8:54-66)
October 14, 2006

The following midrash alludes to the religious significance of the building of the Temple: Said Rabbi Shmuel bar Nahman: Before the Temple was built, the world stood on a throne with only two legs; when the Temple was built, the world stood firm. (Tanhuma Terumah 9)

Solomon proclaimed in God's name: "Since the day that I brought forth My people Israel out of Egypt, I choose no city out of Israel to build a house, that My name might dwell there… '[but now I (Solomon)] have set a place for the ark, wherein is the covenant of the Lord, which He made with our fathers, when He brought them out of the land of Egypt." (8:16; 21) Consequently, Solomon's dedication of the Temple was second in religious significance only to the giving of the Torah at Mount Sinai. (Y. Keil, Melahim, Daat Mikra, p. 193)

At the beginning of chapter 8, we were told that this monumental event occurred at the "feast – (hag)" in the seventh month then know as the month of Ethanim. (8:2) At the end of the chapter, which is included in this special haftarah for Shmini Atzeret, the extent of the festivities is described: "So Solomon and all of Israel with him – a great assemblage, from Lebo-hamath to the Wadi of Egypt – observed the Feast (hag) at that time before the Lord our God, seven days and again seven days, fourteen days in all. On the eighth he let the people go...." (65-66) The context of this verse makes it obvious that the "hag" being talked about here is Sukkoth and the eighth day when Solomon sent the people off, Shmini Atzeret. (This explains the assignment of this haftarah to Shmini Atzeret.) The association of the second seven days with Sukkoth is strengthened by a parallel tradition found in the book of Chronicles: "they observed the dedication of the altar for seven days and the Feast seven days" (2 Chronicles 7:9)

This understanding posed a problem for the rabbinic tradition. If the second seven days of celebration coincided with Sukkoth, then the first seven days included Yom Kippur. (See Rashi and Rabbi David Kimche) In other words, the dedication of the Temple was apparently so monumental that it superseded the observance of Yom Kippur.

How could it be that Solomon could override the observance of Yom Kippur? The Talmud comes to answer this question: "Said Rabbi Parnah said Rabbi Yochanon: 'That year Israel did not observe Yom Kippur, and the people were worried and said: [perhaps because we have transgressed and not observed Yom Kippur,] we are deserving of destruction? A heavenly voice pronounced: All of you merit life in the world to come. How do we know this? They argued: If in the Sanctuary [in the desert] which was not to be for perpetuity, an individual's sacrifices offered at its inauguration were permitted even on Shabbat which meant doing things on Shabbat which normally would warrant the death by stoning, all the more so is it permitted for the Temple, whose sanctity is for ever, the offering communal, and the punished for transgressing Yom Kippur is only kareth (premature death), how much more so! So what were the people so worried about? They thought this understanding referred only to offerings to God, but what about their eating and drinking – all these are common needs? Shouldn't they have made their offerings without partaking of food and drink? [The Talmud replied:] There is no joyous celebration without eating and drinking. (adapted from Moed Katan 9a)

This discussion illustrated that our tradition has its own means for contending with what seem to be contradictions in the law. There are certain times when one practice supersedes another, for instance: the saving of a life (pikuah nefesh) overrides the observance of Shabbat, a person judged as too ill to fast by a doctor is not allowed to fast on Yom Kippur and in our case the dedication of Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem was deemed so important as to set aside Yom Kippur. On any of these occasions, not to do as the law requires would be considered a transgression and what might seem to be piety would have been a sin.

This study piece is offered as a service of the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva. It is prepared by Rabbi Mordechai (Mitchell) Silverstein, senior lecturer in Talmud and Midrash at the Conservative Yeshiva. He is a graduate of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America. With the permission of The United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem, Rabbi Edward S. Romm - Director of Education© 2005

Thursday, October 05, 2006

Daily Minyan

Dear Congregants:
I would like to discuss the daily Minyan with you. Most of you become aware of this service when a parent or spouse is lost and the obligation to say Kaddish becomes an acute awareness. But the obligation to pray is always there and a large number of conservative synagogues support a morning Minyan [Shacharit] and an afternoon Minyan, davening either the afternoon service [Minchah] or the evening service [Ma'ariv] depending on the time of the year.

The Ritual Committee has just set the time for the afternoon or evening service at 6:15 pm. The change from 6 pm to 6:15 is to accommodate more people who must work later than others.

The fact of life is that sooner or later all of us will have the obligation to say Kaddish for a loved one as our loved ones will say Kaddish for us. It is heart breaking to come to synagogue and find that there is not a Minyan, especially in your time of need. Because you will expect to have a Minyan when you need it, I suggest that we all make it a practice of coming to Minyan on some regular basis, even if that is only once a month. Once you start coming you will find that it is perhaps the simplest mitzvah you can do and it is habit forming.

And after the mourning period is over, Kaddish is still said on the anniversary [Yartzeit] of the death of parent, spouse, sibling or child.

I have a simple suggestion, if you want to insure a Minyan, call some friends to come to synagogue with you for a Yartzeit. I find that few refuse and most are honored to be asked.

I hope that you find these commentaries on the Haftorah interesting and educational. AND DON'T FORGET THAT FRIDAY NIGHT IS THE BEGINNING OF SUKKOTH AND SERVICES WILL BE AT 6:30 PM. Saturday services will be at 10 am and Sunday services for the 2nd day will also be at 10 am. Friday October 13th is Hoshannah Rabbah and Saturday the 14th is Shemini Atzeret with yizkor and Sunday is Simchat Torah. Times will be announced later but since all these holidays are on weekends please try to ATTEND.

Henry Ray Wengrow
Ritual Chair
Beth Shalom

Sukkot - First Day

Sukkoth- First Day
(Zechariah 14:1-21)
October 7, 2006

Zechariah's prophetic message, in this special Haftorah for Sukkoth, records his vision of the end of time. This dramatic account, which according to Zechariah will occur during Sukkoth, foresees an excruciatingly painful attack by the nations upon Jerusalem and God's ultimate triumph over these enemies. The remnant of God's enemies will, in the end, recognize Him and make Him the source of their worship. The description of God's battle with His enemies is vivid and its consequences are cataclysmic: "Then the Lord will come forth and make war on those nations as He is wont to make war on a day of battle. On that day He will set His feet on the Mount of Olives, near Jerusalem on the east; and the Mount of Olives shall split across from east to west, and one part of the Mount shall shift to the north and the other to the south, a huge gorge" (14:3-4)

How is one to understand this vision? There seem to have been two major tendencies, one which viewed God's setting His foot on the Mount of Olives as an actual description of God and His actions and the other which understood these images figuratively. The first tendency can be seen in this excerpt from a 4th century midrash: "[A pagan asked:] Does your God have legs? [The Jew responded:] "With regard to your deity it is written: 'They have legs but they cannot walk' (Psalm 115:7) but with regard to our God, it is written: 'On that day, He (God) will set His feet on the Mount of Olives.'" (Lamentations Rabbah 1:40) This perspective remained a credible point of view all the way into the middle ages, particularly among Rashi's students and colleagues, as is illustrated in the commentary of Rabbi Joseph Kara (12th century France): "He will set His feet" – this refers to the feet of the Holy One Blessed be He.

The second perspective also had early representation: "Ten descents did the Shechina (God's Indwelling Presence) make into the world: "And One will take place in the future, in the days of Gog and Magog. As it is said: 'And His feet shall stand that day upon the Mount of Olives.'" (Avot deRabbi Natan version a, chapter 34, Schechter ed. p. 102) Similarly, Targum Yonathon (~7th century Eretz Yisrael) also professed this viewpoint in its translation: "And He (God) revealed His might, at that time, on the Mount of Olives." This school of thought became prevalent amongst early Spanish Jewry which tended to be more rational in its outlook, as is evidenced in the words of Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra (11th century Spain): Behold God will perform signs and wonders on that day that have yet to be seen. This is made even more explicit by Rabbi David Kimche (12th century Provance): "One should read this verse as a parable--as is interpreted by the great sage, Rabbeinu Moshe, [one must understand this vision to mean] that God is the cause of the miracles that will be seen there." (adapted translation)

The contrast between these two positions could not be more pronounced. Each vantage point is profoundly influenced by worldview and cultural milieu. What joins these disparate positions is a loyalty to a shared text of meaning and a desire to shape the way they look at the world through the sacred text. Since their theological outlook regarding the text represent human attempts to understand that which is ultimately beyond human beings, it should not surprise us that their interpretations should vary so. What remains important is that they see God's "hand" involved in their own lives and ultimately in ours. This message is central to the festival of Sukkoth.

This study piece is offered as a service of the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva. It is prepared by Rabbi Mordechai (Mitchell) Silverstein, senior lecturer in Talmud and Midrash at the Conservative Yeshiva. He is a graduate of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America. With the permission of The United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem, Rabbi Edward S. Romm - Director of Education© 2005

Thursday, September 28, 2006

Parshat Haazinu - Shabbat Shuvah

Parshat Haazinu - Shabbat Shuvah
(Hosea 4:2-10; Joel 2:15-27; Micah 7:18-20)
September 30, 2006

The season of repentance is not without its own unique problems. Sin does not relinquish its captives easily and consequently, the abandonment of sin is an arduous process. The prophet Hosea recognized this painful truth in his call to return to God: "Return, O Israel, to the Lord your God, for you have fallen (kashalta) because of your sin." (4:2)

One component of this verse recognizes the adverse affect that sins have on their subjects. Rashi understands the affects of sin as a matter of cause and effect: "Stumbling blocks will come upon you as a result of your sins." In other words, if a person sins, the result will be that the person's life will become more difficult as a punishment for the sins. On a similar note, Rabbi Joseph Kara (12th century France) marks a similar interpretation based on the context of the verse in the prophecy of Hosea: "for you have stumbled before your enemies because you have no strength to stand before them since your sins have caused you to stumble.

Rabbi David Kimche sees the sins themselves as the stumbling block: "Because you have stumbled in your sins, [you need to return to God]. When you see that you have stumbled in your sins, you must therefore return to God, for there is no one else to raise you from these stumbling blocks other than return to God. This interpretation offers the beginning of a remedy. The sinner can find not only refuge from sin in a return to God but also a source of strength as a bulwark against sin. The following debate in the Talmud examines how this might work, utilizing a creative interpretation of our verse: Said Reish Lakish: So great is repentance that it changes the status of willfully committed sins into that of sins which were accidentally committed, as it is written: 'Return, O Israel, unto the Lord your God for you have stumbled because of your sins.' – behold, your willful sins are called "stumbling blocks" (miksholim from the verb kashal). [The Talmud challenges this opinion offering an even more radical formulation:] Can it really be the case [that willful sins can be changed into accidental sins]? Didn't Reish Lakish say [something even more radical]: So great is repentance that willful sins will be converted into merits, as it is written: 'when a wicked person turns away from his wickedness and does what is just and right, it is he who will live by virtue of these things.' (Ezekiel 33:19) [The Talmud resolves this contradiction in the words of Reish Lakish:] There is no contradiction! In the case where sins are turned into merits, we are talking about when repentance is done out of love for God, while the case where willful sins are converted into accidental sins refers to repentance out of fear of punishment. (Yoma 86b)

Reish Lakish asserts that God offers us an inducement for doing teshuva. Teshuva has the potential for downgrading the seriousness of the sins that we have performed in God's eyes. It even offers the possibility for turning a sinner into a person of virtue. Everything depends on taking the first step in our return to God, whether out of fear or out of love, the change will be monumentally for the good.

This study piece is offered as a service of the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva. It is prepared by Rabbi Mordechai (Mitchell) Silverstein, senior lecturer in Talmud and Midrash at the Conservative Yeshiva. He is a graduate of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America.

With the permission of The United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem, Rabbi Edward S. Romm - Director of Education© 2005

Best wishes for a "Tzom Kal", an easy fast.
Henry Ray Wengrow
Ritual Chair
Beth Shalom

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Selichot

Selichot Services will be held this Saturday night at 9 pm.This will be a joint service with the Tree of Life Temple and will be at the Tree of Life. Please join us and meet the new Rabbis of Columbia.

Kever Avot Services
Sunday, October 1
Hebrew Benevolent 11:00 a.m.
Whaley St. Cemetery 11:45 a.m.
Arcadia Lakes Cemetery 12:30 p.m.

Parshat Nitzavim-Vayeleh

Parshat Nitzavim-Vayeleh
(Isaiah 61:10-63:9)
September 16, 2006

This week's Haftorah brings to a close the seven special haftarot of consolation which follow Tisha b'Av. It is also the last Haftorah before Rosh Hashanah, making it the last Haftorah of the month of Elul, the month in which we make preparation for the Y'mei Teshuva – the days of Repentance. Isaiah's prophecy opens with the joyful image of the nuptial joining of groom and bride, each envisioning the other in their marital finery: "I greatly rejoice in the Lord, my whole exults in my God. For he has clothed me in garments of triumph, wrapped me in a robe of victory, like a bridegroom adorned with a turban, like a bride bedecked with her finery." (61:10)

This image, of course, was intended to express the exuberant joy at the physical restoration of the nation, its redemption from foreign subjugation and the return of the Babylonian exiles to their long dreamt for homes in Jerusalem and Judea. The conjoining of the image of marital union with a sense of returning home came to mean much more than a representation of physical return of God's people to their land. It also came to embody the essence of the very relationship between God and His people, as we note in the following Midrash: "[This matter is similar to the case of] the orphan girl who was raised in the palace. When it came time for her to marry, they said to her: 'Have you anything for a dowry?' She answered them: 'I have an inheritance from my father and an inheritance from my grandfather.' So, too, the people of Israel have merits from Abraham and they have merits from our father, Jacob. 'For he has clothed me in garments of triumph' – because of the merits of Jacob, [as we learn from the verse,] 'And the hides of the offspring of goats she (Rebecca, his mother) wrapped (clothed) on his hands' (Gen. 27:16). 'Wrapped me in a robe of victory' – this refers to Abraham, our forefather, [as it is written,] I [God] have singled him out, that he may instruct his children and his posterity to keep the way of the Lord by doing what is just and right, in order that the Lord may bring about for Abraham what He has promised.' (Gen. 18:19) 'Like a bridegroom adorned with a turban, like a bride bedecked with her finery.' – You find that when the children of Israel stood at Mount Sinai, they comported themselves with the modesty of a bride, veiling one eye and leaving the other uncovered.* (Pesikta d'Rav Kahana 22:4. Mandelbaum ed. pp. 328-9)

The people of Israel yearn to reestablish their intimate relationship with God. For this purpose they call upon the merits of their ancestors, Abraham, Jacob and all of Israel who stood at Sinai to provide them with the means to restore their relationship with God. In particular, the rabbis saw in the special modesty of the people at the moment of the revelation at Sinai, behavior worth emulating as a model for returning to God. May we, too, approach God with all the humility and modesty that we can muster so that we might also restore the intimacy that we have lost with Him during this past year.

*[Hagrash Lieberman points out that it was the custom of Jewish women in Eretz Yisrael during rabbinic times, as a matter of modesty, to cover themselves with a veil, leaving only one eye uncovered . This custom, he notes is attested to in both Jewish and no-Jewish sources. See "al Hataim v'Onsham", Louis Ginsberg Jubilee Volume, p. 370)

This study piece is offered as a service of the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva. It is prepared by Rabbi Mordechai (Mitchell) Silverstein, senior lecturer in Talmud and Midrash at the Conservative Yeshiva. He is a graduate of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America.

With the permission of The United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem, Rabbi Edward S. Romm - Director of Education© 2005

Henry Ray Wengrow
Ritual Chair
Beth Shalom

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

A New Era for Beth Shalom

Rabbi and Education Director to Begin Serving Beth Shalom after Labor Day

Rabbi David Siff was ordained in May from the Jewish Theological Seminary. He is working on a doctorate in Jewish philosophy and is writing his dissertation.

Rabbi Siff grew up in Western Massachusetts. He knew he wanted to become a rabbi after spending a year in Israel following his graduation from Dartmouth College. He also met his wife Tanya at the Yeshiva that year. They have been married for six years. Tanya is finishing her doctorate in clinical psychology.

Siff is excited about his move to Columbia. “I’m so impressed by the level of learning, participation and Jewish involvement,” he said. “And even though this is considered a small Jewish community, everyone I’ve met is Jewish.”

Siff is coming to Columbia with lots of ideas but hopes to get a strategic planning committee to help decide priorities. He’s looking forward to working with the new Education Director Rebecca Pinsker. His primary goal is for the children of Beth Shalom to grow up knowing how to lead meaningful Jewish lives.

Bruchim Haba’im Rabbi David and Tanya Siff!

Jewish learning has been a part of Rebecca Pinsker’s life as long as she can remember. The lifelong learner attended Rabbinical school, earned a Master’s degree in Jewish Studies and is finishing a Master’s in Jewish education. She most recently served as Director of Education at P’nai Or Synagogue in Mount Airy, Pennsylvania. She also recently taught Tanach at Gratz College and Jewish education at Beth Or Synagogue.

Pinsker is married to retired podiatrist Dr. Arnold Pinsker and they have six children among them, ranging in age from 21 to 50.

She was very impressed during her initial visit to Columbia. “This is a wonderful, welcoming community. I view this as such an opportunity,” said Pinsker. She hopes to create an open atmosphere where students are excited about learning. “I want our students and their parents to be proud of Judaism and feel the shul is their home.”

Look for music to play a big role in Rebecca Pinsker’s teaching style. She enjoys playing guitar, piano and cantorial singing.

Welcome to Columbia, Rebecca and Arnold Pinsker!

Friday, September 01, 2006

Parshot Ki Tetze and Shofitm

These commentaries have been getting to you late due to difficulties in Jerusalem so this e mail contains last week’s commentary on Parshat Shoftim as well as this weeks commentary on Ki Tetze.

The commentary for Shoftim is very moving and has significance beyond just being a weekly commentary. It contains a Midrash that you may be familiar with and Rabbi Mordechai (Mitchell) Silverstein places it in context of our existence as Jews.

We are now in the month of Elul which is a time of repentance in preparation for the High Holidays of Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur. Tradition teaches that the month of Elul is a particularly propitious time for repentance. This mood of repentance builds through the month of Elul to the period of Selichot, to Rosh Hashanah, and finally to Yom Kippur.

Parshat Ki Tetze
(Isaiah 54:1-10)
September 2, 2006

The interrelationship between tribulation and redemption has played a critical role in the history of the people of Israel and the formulation of the Jewish outlook on the significance of life. Many of the commandments found in the Torah presuppose an awareness of our past tribulations or the fact that God redeemed us from past tragedy. Whatever the didactic value of these life experiences has been on our people (and one can easily say that these experiences have molded the people of Israel into a unique religious community), the constant cycle of tragedy and redemption is bound to have become wearisome. Still, even during Biblical times, constantly having to contend with the onslaught of conquering nations, destruction, exile, redemption, return, rebuilding, and the reformulation of religious and national identity were monumental barriers to national wellbeing. They were more often than not a source of pain and shame, as this week's Haftorah, the fifth of the seven special haftarot which follow Tisha b'Av (shiva d'nehamta – seven of consolation) indicates: "Fear not, you shall not be ashamed; Do not cringe, you shall not be disgraced; For you shall forget the reproach of your youth and remember no more the shame of your widowhood." (54:10)

This prophecy seems to contain the promise that those who return from exile after the destruction of the First Temple will no longer be vanquished, exiled, and insulted by their enemies. (A. Hacham, Isaiah, Daat Mikra, p. 579) This idea is elaborated in the following midrash: "The children of Israel say to the Holy One blessed be He: 'Master of the Universe, whenever we are enslaved, we are shamed and embarrassed, so You, God, redeem us and we will no longer be embarrassed, since when You redeem us, it will be forever'… The children of Israel retorted: 'Didn't you long ago redeem us by the hands of Moses, and by the hands of Joshua, and by the hands of judges and kings? Yet we are again in slavery and shame, as though we had never been redeemed.' God responded: 'Since these previous redemptions were carried out by flesh and blood, and you were led by mortals, here today and tomorrow in the grave, that is why your redemption was only temporary, but in the future when I (God) redeem you, your redemption will stand forever… God added: In the past you were able to suffer embarrassment and shame because you were young, but now that have grown old, you no longer have the strength to withstand the shame of exile. Therefore, 'Fear not, you shall not be ashamed… For you shall forget the reproach of your youth...'" (Adapted and abridged from Midrash Tehillim 31:2 Buber ed. p. 237)

This midrash expresses the idea that human patience can also wear thin and urges upon God to help us bring about the ultimate redemption – one that will be eternal, so that we may build God's kingdom on earth.


Parshat Shoftim
(Isaiah 51:11-52:12)
August 26, 2006

The earliest evidence in our hands of fixed haftarot for certain Shabbatot comes to us from a collection of midrash known as Pesikta de Rav Kahana. This midrashic compilation, from the Talmudic period in Eretz Yisrael (4-5th century), differs from other midrashim in that it is not organized as an interpretation of a particular book of the Bible. Its chapters are, instead, organized around special Torah and Haftorah reading on the liturgical calendar. Among these special readings are found the haftarot for the three weeks preceding Tisha b'Av and the seven weeks after this tragic day. This makes these haftarot the oldest recorded haftarot still a part of the liturgical calendar.

We are used to studying selections from the midrashic tradition – midrash reflecting certain ideas or interpretations of particular pieces of Scripture which interest us, but it is worth noting that midrashic compilations like Pesikta de Rav Kahanah were not just arbitrary collections of all of the material available at the time on a given verse or even anthologies on given books of the Bible, rather they are literary works which were actually composed. This means that chapters of any given midrash have a literary structure and that the parts of each chapter have literary purpose. I present you with this brief introduction because the following midrash is found in the chapter of the Pesikta for this week's Haftorah even though there does not seem to be any direct textual linkage.

I bring it to you because it beautifully captures an important aspect of Jewish existence and the compiler of the Pesikta apparently thought it to be thematically linked to this week's Haftorah: "Rabbi Aba bar Kahana in the name of Rabbi Yochanan: 'This can be compared to the case of a king who betrothed a noble lady and wrote for her in her ketuba a sizable pledge: 'So and so many marriage canopies I shall prepare for you, so and so many ornaments I shall provide for you, and many treasures I will give to you.' The king then left the woman and she waited there for many years. Her friends continually made fun of her, saying, 'How long are you going to sit? Get yourself a husband while you are still young and vigorous. [What did she do?] She went into the house and took out her ketubah and read it and found comfort. After a long while, the king finally returned from overseas. He said to her: 'My daughter, I am amazed at how you have had faith in me all these years.' She said to him: 'My lord, king, were it not for the substantial ketubah that you wrote out for me, my friends would have made you lose me.'

So too, since in this world, the nations of the world mock Israel, saying to them: How long will you be put to death for the sake of your God and give your lives for Him? How much pain does He bring on you? How much embarrassment and pain does He bring on you? Come, become like us and we will make you dukes and governors and generals. When the Israelites hear these things, they go into their synagogues and study houses and take out their Torahs and read: 'And I [God] shall walk in your midst, and I shall make you prosper, and I shall make you numerous, and I shall carry out my covenant with you.' (Lev. 26:9) and they are comforted.

When the end will come, God will say to Israel: 'I am surprised at how you waited for Me all these years.' And Israel will reply: 'Master of the world, if it were not for Your Torah, that You wrote for us, the nations would have drawn us away from You', as it is written: 'I recall to mind therefore I have hope.' (Lam. 3:21) David also said: 'If your Torah had not been my delight, I would have perished in my affliction.' (Psalm 119:92) (Adapted from Pesikta de Rav Kahana 19:4 Mandelbaum ed. pp. 305-6)

I think this Midrash speaks for itself!

This study piece is offered as a service of the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem. It is prepared by Rabbi Mordechai (Mitchell) Silverstein, senior lecturer in Talmud and Midrash at the Conservative Yeshiva. He is a graduate of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America.

With the permission of The United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem, Rabbi Edward S. Romm - Director of Education
© 2005

Henry Ray Wengrow
Ritual Chair
Beth Shalom

Friday, August 04, 2006

Parshat Va-ethanan

Dear Congregants:

I hope that you find these commentaries on the Haftorah interesting and educational.


Parshat Va-ethanan
Shabbat Nachamu
(Isaiah 40:1-26)
August 5, 2006

The enemies of the Jewish people seem almost unconsciously to be drawn to the three weeks between the seventeenth of Tamuz, the day that marks the first breech by the Romans of the walls of Jerusalem in the days of the Second Temple, and Tisha b'Av, the day on which we mourn the destruction of both the First and Second Temples. These three weeks, known as "bein hametzarim" which translates literally as "between the straits", have throughout Jewish history been associated with Jewish tragedy. This attitude is even marked in the Halacha: "When the month of Av arrives, we decrease our rejoicing… legal proceedings should be avoided because these days are not propitious." (Shulhan Aruch, Orach Hayim 551:1)

Liturgically, the Shabbat after this period is known as Shabbat Nahamu – the Shabbat of Consolation. This name is derived from the first words of Isaiah's message in this week's Haftorah: "Nahamu nahamu ami – Comfort, Oh comfort My people, says your God." (verse 1) This Haftorah marks a religious change in moods on the Jewish calendar, from a somber period of mourning, tragedy, and misfortune to one of solace, relief and reconciliation with God.

This transformation is reflected in the following midrash: 'How long will My glory be mocked, will you love illusions? (Psalm 4:3) How long will you pursue after empty things? Why do you say, 'The Holy One Blessed be He has abandoned Israel and forgotten Israel? Why do you say that the Shechina (God's indwelling presence) will never return to Israel?' Rather [the nations of the world who say these things] 'seek only delusions' (Ibid.) What do you nations think? Just because I [God] abandoned Israel for a moment, you really think that it will be forever? Rather, 'know that the Lord singles out the faithful for Himself, the Lord hears when I call to Him." (Ibid. 4) [God already made this known through Isaiah: 'Comfort, Oh comfort My people' (Isaiah 40:1) When the appointed time comes, 'the Lord hears when I [Israel] call Him.' (Psalm 4:4) (adapted from Midrash Tehillim 4:8 Buber ed. pp. 45-6)

The enemies of Israel often assume that God has rejected His people and can consequently easily be conquered. These enemies should be forewarned of the fallacy of such ideas. Isaiah's message is eternal and the time of consolation is upon us in these days after the culmination of Tisha b'Av.


This study piece is offered as a service of the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva. It is prepared by Rabbi Mordechai (Mitchell) Silverstein, senior lecturer in Talmud and Midrash at the Conservative Yeshiva. He is a graduate of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America.

With the permission of The United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem, Rabbi Edward S. Romm - Director of Education
© 2005

Thursday, July 27, 2006

Tisha B'Av Services

Beth Shalom Synagogue will not have Tisha B'Av services this year, but Rabbi Epstein has kindly invited our congregation to observe this day of mourning with The Learning Shul.

Services will be held in the Kline Auditorium at Beth Shalom on August 2, 2006 beginning at 7:00 PM with Minchah, followed by the traditional meal of hard boiled egg and bread, Ma'ariv and the reading of the Book of Lamentations.

Tisha B'Av
Wednesday, August 2, 2006
7:00 PM with Minchah
Kline Auditorium at Beth Shalom
Book of Lamentations

Tisha B'Av

Tisha B'Av will occur at sunset
August 2, 2006 until- nightfall August 3, 2006

According to the Mishnah five specific events occurred on the ninth of Av that warrant fasting:

Five misfortunes befell our fathers ... on the ninth of Av

...On the ninth of Av it was decreed that our fathers should not enter the [Promised] Land, the Temple was destroyed the first and second time, Bethar was captured and the city [Jerusalem] was ploughed up. -Mishnah Ta'anit 4:6

...Should I weep in the fifth month [Av], separating myself, as I have done these so many years? -Zechariah 7:3

In the fifth month, on the seventh day of the month ...came Nebuzaradan ... and he burnt the house of the L-RD... -II Kings 25:8-9

In the fifth month, on the tenth day of the month... came Nebuzaradan ... and he burnt the house of the L-RD... - Jeremiah 52:12-13

How then are these dates to be reconciled? On the seventh the heathens entered the Temple and ate therein and desecrated it throughout the seventh and eighth and towards dusk of the ninth they set fire to it and it continued to burn the whole of that day. ... How will the Rabbis then [explain the choice of the 9th as the date]? The beginning of any misfortune [when the fire was set] is of greater moment. -Talmud Ta'anit 29a

Tisha B'Av or Tish'ah b'Av (Hebrew: ???? ???, tish‘ah b?-a?) is a major annual fast day in Judaism. Its name denotes the ninth day (Tisha) of the Jewish month of Av, which falls in the high summer. It has been called the "saddest day in Jewish history".

The fast commemorates two of the saddest events in Jewish history -- the destruction of the First Temple (originally built by King Solomon), and the destruction of the Second Temple. Those two events occurred about 556 years apart, but both in the same month, Av, and, as tradition have it, both on the ninth day.

On this day in the year 1312 BCE, the generation of Jews who came out of Egypt under Moses' leadership 16 months earlier were condemned to die in the wilderness (midbar) and the entry into the Land of Israel was delayed for 40 years until the old generation died out.
The traditional 4th and 5th events are the Bar Kokhba's revolt against Rome failed, Bar Kokhba was killed, as was Rabbi Akiva and many other important sages of the Mishnah, and Betar was destroyed and the following the Siege of Jerusalem, the subsequent razing of Jerusalem took place one year later.

A large number of calamities are alleged to have occurred on the ninth of Av:
1. The declaration of the Crusades by Pope Urban II in 1095
2. The burning of the Talmud in 1242
3. In 1290, the signature of the edict by King Edward I expelling the Jews from England
4. The Alhambra decree was put into effect, leading to the Jewish expulsion from Spain in 1492
5. The First World War started in 1914
6. The first killings at Treblinka took place in 1942
7. The AMIA Bombing (Asociación Mutua Israelita Argentina) by Arab terrorists on July 18, 1994 in Buenos Aires, Argentina, which killed 86 and wounded more than 120.

The purpose of the day is not to institute annual commemorations of historical disasters. Rather, they are commemorated on Tisha B'Av. Examples are the destruction of many Jewish communities in the Rhineland during the Crusades. The liturgy often makes mention of specific instances (see below).

Restrictions

As on Yom Kippur, Tisha B'Av is observed as a full day fast that lasts 25 hours (sometimes longer, depending on where one is located), beginning with sunset and ending with nightfall the subsequent day. There are six main prohibitions:
1. Not wearing leather shoes.
2. Abstaining from all food and drink (unless this would be life-threatening)
3. Abstaining from washing or bathing of any kind. Some authorities state that washing solely for the sake of hygiene is acceptable.
4. Abstaining from applying creams or oils. Skin creams, deodorants and makeup are included in this prohibition.
5. Abstaining from sexual relations, hugging, kissing and all other forms of physical affection.
6. Abstaining from studying Torah, though reading Lamentations, Job, some sections of Jeremiah and sections of the Talmud that deal with the laws of mourning is allowed

Although the fast ends at nightfall, eating meat and drinking wine are prohibited until noon of the following day. According to tradition, the Temple burned all night and most of the day of the tenth of Av.

During services in synagogue, and when returning home, from nightfall until mid-day one is required to sit on the floor or on low chairs as during shiv'ah (the week of mourning observed after the death of a first-degree relative). Some even have the custom of sleeping on the floor or other modification to the normal sleeping routine. People must refrain from greeting each other or sending gifts on this day. Old prayer books and Torahs are often buried on this day.

Services

The scroll of Eichah (Lamentations) is read in synagogue during the evening services. In addition, most of the morning is spent reading kinoth ("dirges"), most bewailing the loss of the Temples and the subsequent persecutions, but many others referring to post-exile disasters. These later kinnoth were composed by various poets (often prominent Rabbis) who had either suffered in the events mentioned or relate received reports. Important kinnoth were composed by Elazar ha-Kalir and Rabbi Judah ha-Levi. After the Holocaust, kinnoth were composed by the German-born Rabbi Shimon Schwab (in 1959, at the request of Rabbi Joseph Breuer) and by Rabbi Solomon Halberstam, leader of the Bobov Hasidim (in 1984).

Conservative and Masorti ideas

The law committee of the Masorti Movement (Conservative Judaism in the State of Israel) issued responsa on the question "In our time do we still have to fast for the whole of Tisha b'Av, seeing that our sovereign independence has been regained? May we reduce the outward signs of mourning and permit eating after the Minchah Service?" Two responsa were given:
Rabbi Theodore Friedman wrote that: "There is already an historical precedent in Megillat Ta'anit which stipulated days on which we may not fast because of salvation wrought for Israel. In our time we have been vouchsafed a great salvation in the establishment of the State... It therefore seems to us that this great historical turning point in Israel's history should be celebrated by not completing the fast on 9th Av, but concluding it after the midday Minchah."

Rabbi David Golinkin wrote, concluding "It is forbidden to fast only half the day on Tisha b'Av for several reasons:
1. we have demonstrated that during the period of the Second Temple they did fast on Tisha b'Av...
2. From the Halakic point of view this is not possible. Either we must fast on all four of the fasts [and Tisha b'Av] or on Tisha b'Av alone...
3. From the ideological point of view, we cannot yet say that we have reached the period of "peace". We should revert to the custom of the Ge'onim ... and fast the whole day on Tisha b'Av and declare the other fast days to be voluntary and not compulsory."

This page contains material from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia and the original article maybe found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tisha_B'Av . Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.

Friday, July 21, 2006

Guest Rabbi

Please join us in welcoming Rabbi Gerald Zelmeyer (Interim Rabbi candidate) Monday, July 24 and Tuesday, July 25 6:00 p.m.

Rabbi Zelmeyer will conduct Minyan & D'Var Torah. Please make every attempt to come and meet Rabbi Gerald Zelmeyer at one (or both) of these events.

Rabbi Search Committee

Parshat Mattot-Masey

Parshat Mattot-Masey
(Jeremiah 2:4-28; 3:4)
July 22, 2006

The end of this week's Haftorah, the second of the three haftarot of admonition (tlata depuranuta) which precede Tisha b'Av, contains a scathing indictment of the nation's disloyalty to God. The prophet Jeremiah is at a loss to understand the people's idolatry and ends his complaint with a mocking, hyperbolic exaggeration of the absurdity of their practices: "And where are those gods that you have made for yourselves? Let them arise and save you, if they can, in your hour of calamity. For your gods have become, O Judah, as many as your towns!" (2:28)

Jeremiah's sarcasm is hard to miss. He ridicules his fellow countrymen, who now face catastrophe, for putting their trust in deities who are nonentities. He taunts them to call upon their gods who are so multitudinous that it seems that there is not a single city without its own god and still these deities are without the capacity to save them. (See M. Bula, Daat Mikra Jeremiah, p. 28; Y. Hoffman, Mikra L'Yisrael Jeremiah, p. 146) Jeremiah's message is clearly intended to cause his countrymen to turn away from their false ways and return to God.

The Amora (Talmudic sage), Rabbi Shimon ben (Resh) Lakish (3rd century Eretz Yisrael) used this verse to explain how a problem like idol worship progressively infects a society and eventually becomes an inexorable problem leading to its ultimate destruction from moral and religious decay: Said Resh Lakish: 'Woe to those who join house to house, field to field' (Isaiah 5:8) – you cause the destruction of the First Temple to touch that of the Second Temple – just as in the time of destruction of the First Temple, 'Zion shall become a plowed field' (Jeremiah 26:18), so, too, in the time of the destruction of the Second Temple, 'Zion will become a plowed field'. 'Till there is no room for anyone to dwell in the land'. (Isaiah 5:8) What caused the Temple to be destroyed? It was destroyed because there was not a single place left where the people had not set up some form of idolatrous worship. [How did such a situation come about?] At first, people would practice idolatry in a hidden place and when no one tried to prevent them, they took to practicing it in their homes behind closed doors; again when no one said a word, they took to practicing their idolatry openly on the roofs of their homes. When this was ignored, they began to do it on hilltops. Here, too, no one paid attention, so they took to doing it openly in the field. Again, there was no protest, so they began to do it openly on street corners. No one admonished them, so they began to carry out their practices in the middle of the street. When this too was ignored, they practiced their idolatry openly in all of the cities, as it is written: ' For your gods have become, O Judah, as many as your towns!' (Jeremiah 2:28) When even this was ignored, they brashly took to practicing their idolatry in the streets of Jerusalem, until they become so bold as to introduce their idolatry into the very precincts of the Temple. This sin is what sealed the decree. When they were exiled, Jeremiah cried out: 'How lonely sits the city!' (Lamentations 1:1) (Adapted and abridged from Eicha Rabbah, Petichta 22, Buber ed. pp. 16-17)

Resh Lakish's message urges vigilance to wrong doing. If one ignores problems when they are small then the problem will grow incrementally until the problem is insurmountable. When this happens, there is potential to lose everything.

This study piece is offered as a service of the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva. It is prepared by Rabbi Mordechai (Mitchell) Silverstein, senior lecturer in Talmud and Midrash at the Conservative Yeshiva. He is a graduate of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America.
With the permission of The United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem, Rabbi Edward S. Romm - Director of Education© 2005


Henry Ray Wengrow
Ritual Chair
Beth Shalom

Wednesday, July 12, 2006

Parshat Pinhas

Dear Congregants:
I hope that you find these commentaries on the Haftorah interesting and educational.
For those of you who would like more sources for study, the synagogue web site has a new link. If you go to www.midnet.sc.edu⁄beth_shalom you will find a new entry. It looks like this:

Shabbat times for Columbia, SC 29206

Holiday: Tzom Tammuz on Thursday, 13 Jul 2006
Candle lighting: 8:18pm on Friday, 14 Jul 2006
This week's Torah portion is Parshat Pinhas
Havdalah (72 min): 9:48pm on Saturday, 15 Jul 2006

Click on Parshat Pinhas and you will go to a page that will provide you with 4 sources of commentaries on the Torah reading. The Jewish Theological Seminary and the University of Judaism are both Conservative sites, while to OU Torah Insights is a publication of the Orthodox Union. Torah.org is a Jewish learning site that in its own words tries to avoid labels.
"Our teachers are Orthodox, so they approach the tradition from a traditional perspective (which is logical, after all). But our program so carefully avoids labels and politics that Conservative and Reform Rabbis have actively expressed their support of the program to their congregants and colleagues" Project Genesis.
Bookmark the Beth Shalom home page and visit weekly for candle lighting times and learning.
Henry Ray Wengrow
Ritual Chair
Beth Shalom
Parshat Pinhas
(Jeremiah 1:1-2:3)
July 15, 2006
This week begins the special cycle of three haftarot which precede Tisha b'Av, known as the "tlata depuranuta" (three haftarot of retribution). In the first of the haftarot of this series, Jeremiah is charged with his mission as a prophet and presented with the message he would be responsible for conveying to the people. Since his mandate was to warn the people of their impending doom brought about by their disloyalty to God and immoral behavior, Jeremiah was overcome by trepidations. God reassures him with these words: "So you, gird up your loins, arise and speak to them all that I command you. Do not break down before them, lest I break you before them." (1:17)
This message is striking because it seems to imply a threat as Rabbi David Kimche (13th century Provance) explains: "If you do not fear them and instead have trust in Me (God), I will save you from their hands; but if you are afraid of them, then I will break you even in front of them." Rabbi Shmuel ben Meir (Rashbam), one of Rashi's grandson, who is known to be especially concerned with the pshat or plain meaning of the Biblical text, must have been deeply perturbed by the implications of this verse since it appears to be one of the rare times when he veers from this principle in his interpretation of this phrase: "Do not fear that I will break you before them, for I will not give you over into their hands."
Maimonides explains God's message to Jeremiah in terms of his philosophical understanding of the nature of prophecy. He explains that both courage and the ability to anticipate the future are natural faculties present in all people to varying degrees. These qualities are especially pronounced in prophets, and in some prophets these qualities border on the unique, creating individuals with "no fear and no dread because it was said to them: 'I (God) will be with you' (Exodus 3:12) Thus it was said to Jeremiah: 'Be not afraid…. Be not dismayed at them… For, behold, I have made you a fortified city…' (Jeremiah 1:17-18)… all of them (the prophets)… were endowed with great courage… Know that the true prophets indubitably grasp speculative matters." Maimonides concluded that the prophet has developed his nature and his intellect through philosophical growth in such a way that he is especially attuned to reality and truth and could discern the consequence of actions and events in such a way as to be able to foresee the future. (See Guide to the Perplexed 2:38) Consequently, while Maimonides does not state explicitly how he interprets the threatening element in God's command, it might be possible to say that he interprets it in a manner similar to Rashbam who reads it not as a threat but as a means to fortify the prophet.
This "prophetic" strength is particularly important for those who discern in their societies behaviors which they view as destructive. They must know that their message will not be easily received and that their message is likely to cause them to suffer the slings of those who are unwilling to heed it. God's message to such individuals is to stand firm.
This study piece is offered as a service of the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva. It is prepared by Rabbi Mordechai (Mitchell) Silverstein, senior lecturer in Talmud and Midrash at the Conservative Yeshiva. He is a graduate of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America.
With the permission of The United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem, Rabbi Edward S. Romm - Director of Education
© 2005
Henry Ray Wengrow
Ritual Chair
Beth Shalom

Back to School, Back to Work, Back to the Future

SAVE THE DATE!!
BACK TO SCHOOL, BACK TO WORK, BACK TO THE FUTURE!
BINGO NIGHT & LIVE AUCTION AT
BETH SHALOM SYNAGOGUE
Sunday, August 27, 2006
4 - 7 p.m.
Please plan to join us for a hot dog cookout and a night of Bingo on
Sunday, August 27 at Beth Shalom Synagogue social hall.
Cash prizes awarded!!
There will also be a live auction during the festivities by
auctioneer extraordinare, Bruce D. Filler.
Adults: $8, children 7-13 years: $5, children 6 and under: free.
Total family cost not to exceed $25.00!!
There will be some wonderful items offered in the auction including:
  • Front row parking spaces for the High Holidays (8 spaces)
  • An elaborate dinner with wine for 6 couples by Howard Stravitz
  • Fine ladies jewelry by J. Kulbersh
  • A weekend at the Isle of Palms (6 bedrooms) from October-May, subject to availability by Peggy and David Jacobs
  • A fabulous and fun dinner & evening for 3-4 couples with Joni and Shep Cutler.
Invite all of your friends (Jewish and non-Jewish) to come. There will be FREE babysitting services available for children 7 and under. Please send in your checks as reservations by August 21 for this evening of fun, food and fellowship and let the office know how many children will need babysitting. Let's all join together and support our synagogue!!

Sunday, July 09, 2006

An Inconvenient Truth

The Environmental Issues Committee of Beth Shalom Sisterhood invites you to join us to view Al Gore's movie, "An Inconvenient Truth," about global warming, this Sunday, July 9, at 7:00 p.m., Columbiana Grande Cinema. Meet in front of the theater at 6:45 p.m. so we can sit together. Afterwards, those who want can stay for ice-cream or tea and discuss the movie and possible plans for our committee or synagogue regarding the issues raised.

If you'd like to carpool over there, please let Meira Warshauer or Gail Schein know. We could meet in the parking lot of the synagogue around 6:20 p.m.

Meira Warshauer

Chair of Environmental Issue Committee

Beth Shalom Sisterhood

(contact info has been edited out)

Parshat Hukkat-Balak

Dear Congregants:
I hope that you find these commentaries on the Haftorah interesting and educational.
Henry Ray Wengrow
Ritual Chair
Beth Shalom
This week we read a double Parshat and the Haftorah is the one that is read with Balak. Both Parshat are familiar to most Jews. Balak contains the "curse" of Balaam "How goodly are your tents, Jacob, your dwelling places, O Israel." This has become a part of our prayer service.
Parshat Hukkat contains the commandment of the Red Heifer, the subject of countless high holiday sermons. G-d told Moses and Aaron, "This is the statute (chukas) of the law which G-d commanded to be told. Tell the Children of Israel to take an unblemished, completely red heifer which has never worn a yoke."
Parshat Hukkat - Balak
(Micah 5:6-6:8)
July 8, 2006
This week's Haftorah is composed of two distinct prophecies (5:6-11; 6:1-8). The first of these prophecies opens with a description of the influence of those Israelites who remain in exile when God redeems the nation: "The remnant of Jacob shall be, in the midst of the many peoples, like dew from the Lord, like droplets on grass – which do not look to any man nor place their hopes in any mortal." (5:6)
Commentators to this verse have struggled over three major questions: 1. What community does this verse refer to? 2. What is their relationship with the people who surround them? 3. What is the significance of the "dew" and "droplets" imagery?
Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra (12th century Spain) reads this verse in the context of the verses which precede it. He asserts that "the Remnant of Jacob" were those Israelites who did not perish in the attempt of the people of Bethlehem to redeem themselves from the Assyrian invaders because they were far away in exile. They are "like dew from the Lord" because they trust exclusively in God and not in the kings of the nations in whose lands they live, for dew is not controlled by man but rather by God. Ibn Ezra offers an alternative explanation (a sure sign that this is a difficult verse to understand): "Or [perhaps this verse refers to Israel] who will teach the nations to call in the name of God and will be for the nation among whom they dwell like I [God] am the dew for them [Israel], and the nations will not longer have to trust in man."
Rabbi David Kimche (13th century Provance), on the other hand, accepts the idea that this verse reflects the results of a battle for the redemption of the nation but puts this redemption and, consequently, our verse in a messianic framework: "Those of the Israelites who remain after God has purified the people will lay siege along with Gog and Magog (the great messianic battle) and Israel will be among them like dew from the Lord, for dew comes from God, from the heavens and one who hopes for them will not trust in man to bring them but rather in God for God brings rain and dew. So, too, Israel will trust only in God for this redemption for He is the sole Redeemer. They will realize that they are a small people and the nations are massive so who else can save them. Their redemption will be like dew and like rain from God." (Abridged)
Moshe Zeidel (20th century Israel) accepts Kimche's time frame but avoids introducing the idea of the messianic battle. He maintains that this verse teaches that in the future Israel will be a blessing in the midst of nations like dew and rain which are symbols of blessing and will not be in need of anyone but God. He further notes that there are commentators (he probably means Ibn Ezra) who associate dew and rain with Torah. According to these authorities this verse intends for Israel to bring the message of the Torah to the nations so that they too might benefit from God's truth (Micah, Daat Mikra, p. 42 – See especially note 57b)
This is an important lesson for the Jewish people. It is time to realize the significance of our belief in God and Torah and how this belief might better the world.
This study piece is offered as a service of the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva. It is prepared by Rabbi Mordechai (Mitchell) Silverstein, senior lecturer in Talmud and Midrash at the Conservative Yeshiva. He is a graduate of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America.
With the permission of The United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem, Rabbi Edward S. Romm - Director of Education © 2005
Henry Ray Wengrow
Ritual Chair, Beth Shalom